I still read a lot about change management, knowledge management and what have you. While I take it on board as you can see over the past year or so, clearly I cannot be bothered blogging about it.

What I will start blogging about, and hence altering the nature of this site (and the frequency with which I post here) is the state and future of work in Australia. Since I was a schoolboy I was fascinated by the idea of work and career, and the idea that computerisation and other social shifts were causing some jobs to not only become ‘cooler’ or more fashionable than others, but that they rose in value while others diminished. This interest led me into politics (and out of it). I built a career (kind of) around IT on the back of it. When politicians talk about jobs they can be terribly condescending, but when they do so they are getting closer to core business than when they walk about almost anything else.

You have to start somewhere, so let’s talk about this articlethat one and this interview by Paul Wallbank.

At the turn of last century, Sydney City Council employed six men to clean the streets of horse manure, and a prediction at the time held that the city would run out of space to store it all by about 1970. Technological and social change solved that problem, and created others.

At that time, Cobb & Co was Australia’s largest transportation network, with a command over the markets for transporting goods and people that no modern company has matched. Cobb & Co could have snapped up the fledgling Qantas for a song, but it didn’t; instead Cobb & Co crashed as Qantas took off, and nobody seems to want to catch the falling knife that is Qantas today.

At that time, Australians feared societies to our north and west where labour was cheap, as they were competitors who would destroy our way of life by doing the same work for less. Back then there was an extra layer of condescension that Australians could put upon such people to shift the debate away from like-for-like product outcome comparisons, and that was racism.

Today, knowledge-work jobs are either being done by software, as Wallbank points out, or (as he doesn’t) software is facilitating the transfer of that work offshore so that middle-class jobs and entry-level professional opportunities are starting to decline here in quantity and status. Today, racism isn’t a factor in deciding whether or not to offshore jobs, but it is still a factor in political debates about who is physically admitted to Australia.

It is hard enough making points about technology-driven social and economic disruption, particularly for a country that tends to avoid discontinuity and upheaval where possible, without buying in to debates about offshoring – which tends to affect professions with little political and social clout anyway.

Hopefully this blog will be a bit more focused and fact-driven and less rambly than this post. But, as far as subject matter goes, this is the road we’re on; less-travelled, thorny and laborious with a strong suspicion there has to be an easier way and someone else is doing this stuff better. And while you might not want to start from here, I have no choice so bear with me.

I read lots of articles on business analysis, change management, knowledge management, and similar issues. This blog will be about posting links to those articles and interrogating them. Others are free to contribute.

This will not be about plugging myself as some sort of expert, or showing only unrelentingly positive articles. Given that something like 70% of projects/change initiatives fail, this is an unsustainable approach. There will be discussion and analysis of failure here as well, for the sake of learning rather than entertainment.

If you want the blog about Australian politics and media, go here.

If you want the life coach/counsellor, go here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.